Anionic Surfactants for Personal Care Formulations | AOS, SLS & KLS
This page provides technical and commercial guidance on three anionic surfactants commonly evaluated in rinse-off personal care products: Sodium Alpha Olefin Sulfonate (AOS), Sodium Lauryl Sulfate (SLS) and Potassium Lauryl Sulfate (KLS). These materials may be used in shampoos, body washes, hand cleansers, facial cleansers and related foaming systems where cleansing, wetting and foam generation are required.
The appropriate surfactant cannot be selected by foam height alone. Formulators must also consider active matter, commercial form, co-surfactants, pH, water hardness, electrolyte response, viscosity, clarity, storage temperature and the desired sensory profile of the finished product.
Aure Chemical is a China-based chemical sourcing and export partner. We work with qualified producers to assist international buyers with grade identification, specification review, document coordination, packing confirmation and export shipment planning. Product availability, specifications and certifications remain subject to confirmation with the selected producing source.
Why Anionic Surfactants Are Used in Personal Care
Anionic surfactants have an amphiphilic structure consisting of a hydrophobic hydrocarbon portion and a hydrophilic negatively charged head group. This structure allows the molecules to adsorb at oil-water, solid-water and air-water interfaces and reduce surface tension. Improved wetting helps the cleansing solution spread across hair and skin and contact sebum, particulate soil and residues from styling or conditioning products.
Above an appropriate concentration, surfactant molecules can form micellar structures that help solubilize oily material and keep removed soil dispersed in the wash water. Mechanical action during rubbing, massaging and rinsing contributes to the overall cleansing process. The final detergency of a personal care product therefore depends on the complete formulation and the method of use, not solely on the identity of the primary surfactant.
Foam is an important sensory and visual cue in shampoos, body washes and hand cleansers. Consumers often associate rapid, abundant and stable foam with effective cleansing. However, foam height is not a direct measure of detergency or mildness. A formulation may produce high foam without delivering the required soil removal, viscosity, rinse feel or skin compatibility.
Primary anionic surfactants are frequently combined with amphoteric surfactants such as betaines or amphoacetates and with nonionic surfactants, hydrotropes, solubilizers and foam modifiers. These combinations can influence foam texture, viscosity, salt response, fragrance solubilization, product clarity and the overall mildness strategy.
Mildness and user experience cannot be determined from the ingredient name alone. They depend on the active concentration, surfactant blend, pH, contact time, rinse efficiency, frequency of use and the complete finished-product composition. Laboratory formulation work and appropriate safety evaluation remain necessary before commercial use.
For a broader overview of this product family, including sulfonate surfactants, sulfate ester surfactants and polymerizable sulfonate monomers, visit the sulfonate and sulfate salts for surfactant and polymer applications pillar page.
AOS, SLS and KLS Comparison for Personal Care Formulations
The following table summarizes the three anionic surfactants covered on this page. It provides general selection guidance rather than a guarantee of performance in a particular formulation.
| Product | CAS No. | Chemical Family | Common Commercial Names | Main Formulation Role | Typical Personal Care Applications | Key Evaluation Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sodium Alpha Olefin Sulfonate | 68439-57-6 | Anionic sulfonate surfactant | AOS, Alpha Olefin Sulfonate, Sodium C14-16 Olefin Sulfonate | Cleansing, wetting and foam generation | Shampoo, body wash, hand wash and foaming rinse-off cleansers | Active matter, physical form, foam profile, water hardness, electrolyte response, odor, color and viscosity in blends |
| Sodium Lauryl Sulfate | 151-21-3 | Anionic sulfate ester surfactant | SLS, SDS, Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate, Sodium Lauryl Sulphate | Cleansing, wetting and strong foam generation | Shampoo, body wash, hand cleanser, selected facial cleansers, oral care and solid cleansing formats | Commercial grade, active matter, chain distribution, moisture, salts, free matter, physical form and finished-product exposure |
| Potassium Lauryl Sulfate | 4706-78-9 | Anionic sulfate ester surfactant | KLS, KDS, Potassium Dodecyl Sulfate, Potassium Lauryl Sulphate | Cleansing and foaming in formulations evaluating a potassium counterion | Specialty liquid cleansers, shampoos, body washes and foaming systems | Commercial form, active matter, temperature behavior, crystallization, electrolyte response, viscosity and clarity |
Commercial-grade consideration: the same chemical name can refer to products with different active matter, moisture, inorganic salts, carbon-chain distribution, physical form and impurity profile. Buyers should evaluate the current specification and batch COA for the exact grade being offered.
Anionic Surfactants for Personal Care Formulation
Common abbreviation
AOS
Functional family
Anionic sulfonate surfactant
Sodium Alpha Olefin Sulfonate is produced through sulfonation of linear alpha-olefins followed by neutralization. Commercial AOS generally contains a mixture of alkenesulfonates and hydroxyalkanesulfonates. The exact carbon-chain distribution and composition depend on the selected producer and feedstock.
AOS contains a direct carbon-sulfur bond and is classified as a sulfonate rather than a sulfate ester. This structural distinction gives AOS a different hydrolytic-stability profile from SLS and KLS. Actual performance nevertheless depends on active matter, pH, temperature, salts, water quality and the complete surfactant blend.
In personal care formulations, AOS may be evaluated for cleansing, wetting and foam generation in shampoo, body wash, hand wash and foaming cleanser systems. It is often considered where abundant foam and performance under moderate water-hardness conditions are important. The actual result should be confirmed using the intended water composition and complete formula.
AOS is frequently blended with amphoteric surfactants such as betaines or amphoacetates. These combinations can influence foam texture, viscosity and the overall mildness strategy. Nonionic surfactants, hydrotropes and polymeric thickeners may also be used to adjust clarity, solubilization and rheology.
AOS does not always respond to sodium chloride or other electrolytes in the same way as sulfate-based systems. Replacing SLS or another primary surfactant with AOS may require reformulation of the co-surfactant ratio, salt level and thickener package. A direct one-to-one substitution should not be assumed.
Fragrance, oils, conditioning polymers and other hydrophobic ingredients may affect foam, clarity and viscosity. Buyers should also review color, odor, moisture, active matter and residual unsulfonated material when comparing commercial AOS grades.
Because AOS is a sulfonate rather than a sulfate ester, formulations using AOS without sulfate ester surfactants may be positioned as “sulfate-free,” subject to the brand owner’s ingredient policy and applicable market requirements. This term is a formulation or marketing classification and does not establish an automatic mildness or safety advantage.
Review the available product information for Sodium Alpha Olefin Sulfonate AOS CAS 68439-57-6 .
For a direct comparison with the sulfate ester products, continue to the AOS, SLS and KLS selection guide.
Sodium Lauryl Sulfate in Personal Care Formulations
Sodium Lauryl Sulfate, Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate and SDS are commonly used names associated with CAS No. 151-21-3. “Sodium Lauryl Sulfate” is widely used in personal care and detergent markets, while “Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate” is common in laboratory, analytical and technical applications.
The chemical name does not by itself define the commercial grade. Personal care grades and laboratory grades may differ in carbon-chain distribution, active matter, moisture, free fatty matter, inorganic salts, impurity profile and physical form. Buyers should not assume that every material described as SLS or SDS has an identical specification.
SLS is evaluated for strong foam generation, wetting and soil removal in shampoos, body washes, hand cleansers and selected facial-cleansing formulations. Suitable grades may also be used in toothpaste and other oral-care products, but oral-care applications require application-specific purity, taste and regulatory review.
In liquid formulations, viscosity may be developed with electrolytes, polymeric thickeners, cellulose derivatives or associative thickeners. The response depends on the active level, co-surfactants, fragrance, salts and other ingredients. Formulators should determine the salt curve and stability profile experimentally.
SLS is often blended with amphoteric or nonionic surfactants to modify foam texture, improve viscosity response and support the desired mildness profile. The finished-product safety assessment must consider active concentration, pH, rinse-off exposure, contact time and the complete ingredient system.
Commercial forms may include powders, needles, flakes, pastes or liquids, subject to producer capability. Powder, needle or flake forms may be used in dry formulations or dissolved during preparation of liquid concentrates. Liquid or paste grades may simplify pumping and batch charging in suitable production systems.
Powder handling also requires consideration of dusting, dissolution time and workplace controls. In liquid systems, the manufacturer should confirm pumpability, storage temperature, dilution procedure and compatibility with the intended processing equipment.
Review the available product information for Sodium Lauryl Sulfate SLS/SDS CAS 151-21-3 .
Potassium Lauryl Sulfate in Personal Care Formulations
Potassium Lauryl Sulfate contains the same general lauryl sulfate anion as Sodium Lauryl Sulfate but uses potassium as the counterion. The counterion difference may influence solubility, crystallization behavior, temperature response and viscosity in some surfactant systems.
The practical effect of the potassium counterion depends on active concentration, temperature, electrolyte content, co-surfactants and the complete formulation. KLS should not be assumed to be universally more soluble, milder or more effective than SLS.
KLS may be evaluated in specialty shampoos, body washes, hand cleansers, liquid soaps and other foaming products in which a potassium-based anionic surfactant is desired. It may also be considered in development work focused on product clarity, low-temperature behavior or a specific rheology profile.
Compatibility with amphoteric and nonionic surfactants should be tested. The salt-thickening response may differ from sodium-based systems, and the selected thickener package may need adjustment. Fragrance, oils, hydrotropes and preservatives may also influence clarity and viscosity.
Commercial KLS may be available in aqueous or solid forms depending on the producer and grade. Buyers should confirm active matter, appearance, moisture, inorganic salts, pH, physical form and storage requirements against the current producer specification.
Direct substitution of KLS for SLS, or SLS for KLS, is not recommended without comparative testing. Low-temperature stability, crystallization behavior and finished-product clarity should be assessed using the actual commercial grades being considered.
Review the available product information for Potassium Lauryl Sulfate KLS CAS 4706-78-9 .
Personal Care Applications for AOS, SLS and KLS
Shampoo Formulations
In shampoo, the primary surfactant system helps remove sebum, dust, styling-product residues and other deposits from the hair and scalp. AOS, SLS and KLS may each be evaluated depending on the desired foam, viscosity, clarity, processing method and market positioning.
Shampoo development commonly requires compatibility testing with amphoteric co-surfactants, conditioning polymers, silicones, fragrance, pearlizing agents and preservatives. Cationic conditioning polymers may interact with anionic surfactants, and the resulting system should be assessed for deposition, clarity and stability.
Salt thickening may be effective in some surfactant blends but not in others. The target pH should be selected according to scalp compatibility, preservative efficacy, ingredient stability and the intended finished-product claims. Clear and pearlescent shampoos may require different solubilization and rheology strategies.
Body Wash and Shower Gel
Body washes and shower gels often require a balance of cleansing, abundant foam, pleasant foam texture and acceptable rinse feel. Fragrance, botanical extracts, emollients and oils can influence clarity, foam stability and viscosity.
AOS and SLS are commonly evaluated as primary anionic surfactants. KLS may be assessed in formulations where a potassium-based system is technically relevant. Amphoteric and nonionic surfactants can be used to adjust foam density, solubilization and the finished mildness profile.
Packaging also affects formulation targets. A thick shower gel for a squeeze bottle requires different rheology from a low-viscosity product for a pump. Low-temperature, elevated-temperature and freeze-thaw testing should be conducted when relevant to the intended distribution conditions.
Hand Wash and Foaming Hand Cleanser
Hand wash products are often used repeatedly, so the complete surfactant blend, active level, pH and rinse behavior require careful evaluation. Rapid foam development and clean rinsing may be important consumer expectations.
Foam-pump systems usually require lower viscosity than conventional gel hand washes. Foam density, bubble structure, pump compatibility and nozzle performance should be tested using the finished formula and intended package.
Preservatives, fragrance, colorants and botanical ingredients may influence clarity and stability. Amphoteric co-surfactants are often included to modify foam and support the overall mildness strategy.
Facial Cleansers
Facial cleansers frequently use a lower total active surfactant level and a greater proportion of amphoteric or nonionic surfactants than strongly cleansing body products. The desired product may range from a high-foam facial wash to a low-foam or cream cleanser.
AOS, SLS and KLS may be evaluated, but high foam should not automatically be treated as the preferred result. Rinse feel, eye-area exposure, sensitive-skin positioning and compatibility with emollients or active ingredients may be more important than maximum foam volume.
Any mildness, sensitive-skin or eye-area claim requires appropriate formulation design, safety assessment and claim substantiation. The presence or absence of a specific surfactant is not sufficient by itself to support such claims.
Oral Care and Specialty Cleansing
SLS is used in some toothpaste and oral-care formulations to provide foaming and assist dispersion during brushing. Oral-care grades require specific attention to purity, taste, odor and compatibility with fluoride, abrasives, flavors and other active ingredients.
AOS and KLS should not be considered automatic substitutes for SLS in oral-care applications. Any replacement requires application-specific grade review, formulation work, safety evaluation and regulatory confirmation.
In cleansing bars, powders and other specialty formats, physical form, dissolution rate, dusting, processing temperature and compatibility with binders or fillers may be as important as foam performance.
How to Choose Between AOS, SLS and KLS
The following matrix offers general orientation. Final suitability depends on the actual commercial grade, active matter, formulation, processing method and finished-product requirements.
| Formulation Requirement | AOS | SLS | KLS | Evaluation Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| High foam volume | Commonly evaluated | Commonly evaluated | Potential fit | Foam stability under water hardness, soil and fragrance load should be tested. |
| Dense or creamy foam | Potential fit | Commonly evaluated | Potential fit | Amphoteric and nonionic co-surfactants strongly influence foam texture. |
| Liquid shampoo | Commonly evaluated | Commonly evaluated | Potential fit | Compare viscosity, clarity, conditioning-polymer compatibility and rinse feel. |
| Body wash or shower gel | Commonly evaluated | Commonly evaluated | Potential fit | Foam texture, active level, fragrance, emollients and rheology are important. |
| Clear liquid cleanser | Potential fit | Potential fit | Potential fit | Clarity is grade- and formulation-dependent and must be checked across the intended temperature range. |
| Powder or solid cleanser | Potential fit | Commonly evaluated | Requires grade review | Physical form, dusting, dissolution and processing method are critical. |
| Facial cleanser | Formulation-dependent | Formulation-dependent | Formulation-dependent | Total active level, co-surfactants, rinse feel and safety assessment are more important than the ingredient name alone. |
| Hand wash | Commonly evaluated | Commonly evaluated | Potential fit | Repeated-use strategy, viscosity, foam and preservative compatibility should be assessed. |
| Foam-pump cleanser | Potential fit | Potential fit | Potential fit | Low-viscosity stability, foam density and package compatibility require testing. |
| Oral care | Not normally selected | Commonly evaluated with a suitable grade | Not normally selected | Application-specific purity, taste and regulatory review are required. |
| Moderate water-hardness conditions | Commonly evaluated | Potential fit | Potential fit | Performance depends on the complete surfactant blend, chelants and water composition. |
| High-electrolyte formulation | Formulation-dependent | Formulation-dependent | Formulation-dependent | Electrolyte tolerance and viscosity response vary among grades and blends. |
| Low-temperature clarity | Potential fit | Potential fit | Potential fit | Counterion and commercial form may affect crystallization, but the actual grade must be tested. |
| Salt thickening | Formulation-dependent | Commonly evaluated | Formulation-dependent | Determine the salt curve for the complete surfactant and thickener system. |
| Blend with betaines or amphoterics | Commonly evaluated | Commonly evaluated | Commonly evaluated | Amphoteric surfactants may influence viscosity, foam texture and mildness strategy. |
| Sulfate-free positioning | Relevant because AOS is a sulfonate rather than a sulfate ester | Not applicable | Not applicable | “Sulfate-free” is a formulation-positioning term and does not establish an automatic safety or mildness benefit. |
Important: a product marked “commonly evaluated” is not automatically suitable for every formula. Performance must be confirmed using the actual commercial grade and the intended finished-product system.
Key Formulation Variables Affecting Surfactant Performance
Active Matter
Commercial surfactants may be supplied at different concentrations. Dosage, freight efficiency and cost-in-use should therefore be compared on an active-matter basis rather than only by price per kilogram. A lower-priced diluted product may not provide the lowest formulation cost.
Active matter also affects water balance, batch size, viscosity and the amount of other surfactants or thickeners required. The actual value should be confirmed through the product specification and batch COA.
pH
The target pH should be selected according to ingredient stability, preservative performance, skin or scalp compatibility, packaging and the intended finished-product claims. There is no single pH range that is automatically suitable for all shampoos, body washes or facial cleansers.
pH may also influence viscosity, clarity and the behavior of conditioning polymers, fragrances, botanical extracts and other formulation components.
Water Hardness
Calcium, magnesium and other dissolved ions may influence foam, detergency, clarity and deposition. The effect depends on the primary surfactant, co-surfactants, chelating agents and the final water composition.
Formulators targeting multiple markets should consider differences in consumer water hardness when designing cleansing performance and stability testing.
Electrolytes and Salt Curves
Sodium chloride and other electrolytes may increase viscosity up to a certain point and then reduce it when the system passes the optimum salt concentration. This relationship is commonly described as a salt curve.
The salt curve differs among AOS-, SLS- and KLS-based blends and also changes when betaines, nonionics, fragrance, preservatives or polymeric thickeners are added. It should be mapped experimentally for the final formulation.
Co-Surfactants and Solubilizers
Amphoteric surfactants may modify foam texture, viscosity and the finished mildness profile. Nonionic surfactants may support solubilization, foam modification or cleansing of oily residues. Hydrotropes and solubilizers may be required for fragrance, oils or other hydrophobic ingredients.
Compatibility cannot be assumed from product categories alone. Formulators should evaluate the actual ingredients at the intended concentrations and processing temperatures.
Thickeners and Rheology
Personal care cleansers may use electrolyte thickening, polymeric thickeners, cellulose derivatives or associative rheology modifiers. Each thickener interacts differently with the surfactant micelles and other ingredients.
The selected system should be assessed for pour behavior, pumpability, suspension, package dispensing, temperature stability and long-term viscosity retention.
Fragrance, Oils and Conditioning Ingredients
Fragrance, essential oils, emollients and conditioning materials may suppress foam, reduce clarity, change viscosity or create separation. Solubilizer demand and deposition behavior should be tested in the complete formula.
Cationic conditioning polymers may form complexes with anionic surfactants. This interaction may be useful for deposition but can also cause haze or instability if the system is not properly balanced.
Temperature and Storage
Low temperatures may cause crystallization, haze or viscosity increase, while elevated temperatures may reduce viscosity, affect fragrance or accelerate color change. Freeze-thaw exposure may also influence emulsion and surfactant stability.
Stability studies should reflect the expected manufacturing, transportation, warehouse and consumer-use conditions of the finished product.
Why Commercial Form and Grade Matter
A chemical name and CAS number identify a substance or product family, but they do not define every commercial parameter. AOS, SLS and KLS may be offered in different concentrations, physical forms and quality grades according to the producer.
Powder, needle and flake forms may reduce the amount of water transported and may be suitable for dry products or preparation of concentrated surfactant bases. They can also require dust control, controlled charging and sufficient mixing time for dissolution.
Paste and liquid products may simplify pumping, automatic dosing and batch charging, but they use more storage volume and may have temperature-dependent flow behavior. Some products may require warming or recirculation before transfer, subject to the producer’s instructions.
Active matter, moisture, inorganic salts, free matter, color, odor and chain distribution can influence finished-product clarity, fragrance profile, viscosity, foam and storage stability. These parameters should be compared against the customer’s manufacturing process and application requirements.
Buyers should obtain the current producer specification and a recent or batch-specific COA. Active-basis pricing, package efficiency, processing labor and total cost-in-use should be considered alongside the nominal price per kilogram.
Documents to Review Before Purchasing
International buyers and personal care manufacturers commonly review the following documents before approving a surfactant grade:
Technical and Quality Documents
Certificate of Analysis: batch-specific or recent representative test results
Technical Data Sheet: typical properties, product form and application direction
Product Specification: agreed limits for the selected grade
Safety Data Sheet: classification, handling, storage and transport information
INCI information: where applicable to the specific cosmetic ingredient and market
Commercial and Regulatory Information
Manufacturing country and producer identification, where available
Packing type, package size and net weight
Shelf-life and storage recommendations
Transport classification and shipping restrictions
Market-specific regulatory declarations
Certification status required by the customer or destination market
Document availability depends on the individual producer, product grade, order quantity and supply arrangement. Buyers should not assume that all producers hold the same REACH coverage, cosmetic declarations, RSPO, Halal, Kosher or other certifications.
Raw-material documents do not replace the finished-product safety assessment or the regulatory obligations of the brand owner, formulator or importer. Cosmetic compliance must be reviewed for the final formula and intended sales market.
Sourcing and Export Support from China
Aure Chemical can assist buyers with the identification of suitable Chinese producing sources, comparison of commercial grades, specification review and collection of available COA, TDS and SDS documentation.
We can also coordinate packing confirmation, sample discussions, commercial quotation, export documents and freight evaluation. Depending on the product, quantity, destination and transport conditions, shipment terms may be discussed on an FOB, CFR, CIF, CPT or DAP basis.
Availability, sample quantity, packing, minimum order quantity, lead time and shipping method depend on the selected product, producer, shipment size and destination. These details must be confirmed for each inquiry.
To support grade matching, buyers should provide their intended application, required active matter or physical form, estimated quantity, destination and any critical quality, regulatory or certification requirements.
Personal care and household cleaning formulations may use related surfactants but follow different performance and regulatory priorities. Buyers working on laundry, dishwashing, hard-surface or industrial cleaners can also review anionic surfactants for detergent and cleaning formulations .
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the main anionic surfactants covered on this page?
This page compares Sodium Alpha Olefin Sulfonate, Sodium Lauryl Sulfate and Potassium Lauryl Sulfate. AOS is a sulfonate surfactant, while SLS and KLS are sulfate ester surfactants. They may all be evaluated in rinse-off personal care systems, but their commercial forms, formulation behavior and suitable applications are not identical.
Is AOS the same as Sodium Lauryl Sulfate?
No. AOS is an alpha olefin sulfonate with a direct carbon-sulfur bond. SLS is a sulfate ester derived from a lauryl or dodecyl alcohol structure. They may both provide cleansing and foam, but they can differ in electrolyte response, viscosity development, water-hardness behavior and compatibility with other ingredients.
Can AOS be used in a sulfate-free shampoo?
AOS is a sulfonate rather than a sulfate ester. A shampoo using AOS without SLS, SLES, KLS or other sulfate ester surfactants may therefore qualify for sulfate-free positioning, subject to the brand owner’s ingredient policy and local requirements. Sulfate-free terminology does not automatically prove that the formula is milder or safer.
Is AOS always milder than SLS?
No universal conclusion can be made from the surfactant names alone. Mildness depends on active concentration, co-surfactants, pH, contact time, rinse conditions and the complete formulation. AOS may be part of a mildness strategy, but the finished product must be properly formulated and evaluated.
Are SLS, SDS and Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate the same material?
These names are commonly associated with CAS No. 151-21-3. However, commercial grades may differ in carbon-chain distribution, active matter, moisture, inorganic salts, free matter and physical form. A laboratory-grade SDS and a personal care surfactant grade should not be assumed to have identical specifications.
What is the difference between Sodium Lauryl Sulfate and Potassium Lauryl Sulfate?
SLS uses sodium as the counterion, while KLS uses potassium. The counterion difference may influence crystallization, solubility, viscosity and temperature response in some formulations. The actual effect depends on the selected grade and complete formula, so comparative laboratory testing is recommended.
Which surfactant is best for body wash?
There is no universally best surfactant. AOS and SLS are commonly evaluated, while KLS may be considered in potassium-based liquid systems. Selection depends on foam texture, active level, rinse feel, viscosity, clarity, fragrance, emollients, market positioning and finished-product safety requirements.
Which surfactant is suitable for a clear liquid cleanser?
AOS, SLS and KLS may all be evaluated in clear liquid systems, but clarity depends on the actual commercial grade, active concentration, salts, co-surfactants, fragrance, oils, temperature and pH. KLS should not be assumed to guarantee clarity. Low-temperature and long-term stability testing are necessary.
Can AOS, SLS and KLS be blended with betaines?
Yes, these anionic surfactants may be blended with compatible amphoteric surfactants such as betaines. Such blends are often used to modify foam texture, viscosity and mildness strategy. The optimum ratio and electrolyte level depend on the actual ingredients and should be determined experimentally.
What specifications should buyers compare when sourcing these surfactants?
Important parameters may include active matter, physical form, moisture, inorganic salts, free matter, color, odor, pH, chain distribution and storage requirements. Buyers should also compare packing, batch consistency, producer documentation and any market-specific regulatory or certification requirements.
How can I request a personal care surfactant quotation from Aure Chemical?
Provide the product name, required grade or active matter, physical form, intended application, estimated quantity, destination, preferred packing and required documents. Aure Chemical will review suitable Chinese producing sources and provide commercial information after product and freight confirmation.
Request Personal Care Surfactant Information
To receive relevant product documents or a commercial quotation, please provide:
Required product name
Target grade or active matter
Preferred physical form
Intended personal care application
Trial quantity or commercial quantity
Destination port or delivery address
Preferred packing
Required COA, TDS, SDS or regulatory declarations
Any certification or market-specific requirements
Product information is available for Sodium Alpha Olefin Sulfonate , Sodium Lauryl Sulfate and Potassium Lauryl Sulfate .
Aure Chemical can assist with grade matching, documentation review, packaging confirmation and export shipment coordination from China. Specifications, packing, availability and certifications remain subject to confirmation with the selected producing source.